Kant And Kant s Metaphysical Theorizing - 1303 Words

Kant’s metaphysical theorizing was in large part focused on the matter of how synthetic a-priori judgements were possible. For Kant, the question of how synthetic a-priori judgements operated was central to understanding the nature of human thinking, and to enabling metaphysics. Previously Kant had been alerted to the writings of David Hume. Hume had effectively claimed that knowledge only came from analytic a-priori judgments or by synthetic a-posteriori. Hume criticized the notion of cause and effect, and claimed it to be product of conventions of thought, rather than reason. Kant had recognized that if Hume’s claims were to be regarded and applied to other key concepts, that it would undermine the basis of metaphysics; due the criticisms ability to be applied to many other key notions of the world. Since metaphysics was being called into question, and it seemed that people were not making progress in metaphysical understanding in the way the sciences seemed to have b een doing, Kant figured that he needed to discern away in which metaphysics was possible, and could be established as a science. Kant begins by considering how metaphysics could be determined. This would involve figuring its object, sources of cognition, and /or type of cognition. Firstly, metaphysics must be non-empirical, and its principles and basic ideas must not be derived from experience. Thus, metaphysics must be a-priori cognition â€Å"coming from pure understanding and pure reason†. It is distinguishedShow MoreRelatedKant and Equality7623 Words   |  31 PagesKANT AND EQUALITY Some readers of this essay will have become impatient by now; because they believe that the problem that perplexes me has been definitively solved by Immanuel Kant. It is certainly true that Kant held strong opinions on this matter. In an often-quoted passage, he reports a personal conversion from elitism: â€Å"I am myself a researcher by inclination. I feel the whole thirst for knowledge and the eager unrest to move further on into it, also satisfaction with each acquisition. ThereRead MoreLeading Ethical Theories Of Ethics1891 Words   |  8 PagesLeading Ethical Theories Consequentialism Deontology Virtue Theory example Mill s utilitarianism Kantian ethics Aristotle s moral theory abstract description An action is right if it promotes the best consequences. An action is right if it is in accordance with a moral rule or principle. An action is right if it is what a virtuous agent would do in the circumstances. more concrete specification The best consequences are those in which happiness is maximized. A moral rule is one that is requiredRead MoreExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pagesphilosophy, void of hope. However, the opinions of existentialist thinkers were often optimistic about the future of human beings. Existentialism can also be difficult to understand because it does not consist of a specific dogma, or a set of metaphysical claims. Existentialism is not a definitive claim about the world or the people in it. It is marked, instead, by a set of themes about the human condition and the struggles and freedoms that humans must endure, or perhaps embrace. Despite the variousRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagesmanaging, organizing and reflecting on both formal and informal structures, and in this respect you will find this book timely, interesting and valuable. Peter Holdt Christensen, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark McAuley et al.’s book is thought-provoking, witty and highly relevant for understanding contemporary organizational dilemmas. The book engages in an imaginative way with a wealth of organizational concepts and theories as well as provides insightful examples from the